|
Ask
the Probate Judge—Intestate Succession, Part 2
|
By Merri
Rudd, appeared June 27, 2002, Albuquerque Journal, Business Outlook
Reprinted with permission
Q: I read your column on intestate succession about the spouse's inheritance
rights to separate property. What if there is no spouse? Does the state get
the property?
Good question! My previous column outlined a surviving spouse's intestate inheritance
rights to both separate and community property. Remember that intestate means
dying without a valid will. It is the job of the personal representative of
the decedent's estate to determine the amount of the shares to distribute to
each beneficiary.
Suppose there is no surviving spouse and no valid will, but the decedent has
surviving children. Under intestate law, these children (called "decedent's
descendants") inherit equal shares of estate. If one child has died, that
child's share passes to his or her children. If more than one child has died
leaving children, then all of the deceased children's children split those shares
equally. This division is known as "by representation," sometimes
called "per capita."
If the decedent had no surviving spouse or children, the surviving parents of
decedent are next in line to inherit under intestate law. Parents inherit equal
shares of the estate if both survive, or all if one parent has died. If there
are no surviving spouse, chil-dren, or par-ents, then decedent's brothers and
sis-ters inherit equal shares of the estate, by representation. If one sibling
has died, that sibling's share passes to his or her children, if any, and, if
none, to the other siblings.
If there are no surviving spouse, chil-dren, parents, or sib-lings, but surviving
grandparents, one-half passes to paternal grandparents and one-half to maternal
grand-parents, but if not alive, to more dis-tant relatives.
A person's intestate estate passes to the state only if no takers (relatives)
exist. In that case the property escheats to the state and becomes part of the
"current school fund" per the New Mexico Constitution. In reality
the absence of all relatives is not very common. If the decedent has absolutely
no living rela-tives, (s)he should have created a will or trust leaving property
to friends, charity, etc. This would prevent the property from passing to the
state.
A valid will trumps the laws of intestate succession. If you do not intend for
one of your children or other relatives to inherit, you must have a will that
clearly states your intentions. If you did not leave a valid will, under intestate
law, the child or relative you wanted to disinherit will receive a share of
your assets despite your wishes.
Remember that New Mexico's laws on intestate succession only provide for blood
relatives, so if you wish to leave something to in-laws, charity, a school,
friends, or other non-family members, a will or trust would be neces-sary.
© 2002, Merri Rudd & Albuquerque Journal, All Rights Reserved